Checking claims made about OXT

[richmond62]

Paul, you have made several claims about OXT being 'more' than just a dephlogisticated copy of LC 963.

BUT, as you have released no new builds since you initial ones (and nothing for Windows) I wonder how anyone is able to validate these claims.

AND, as you should have noticed, comments in this forum (except my non-stop background noise) have reduced to a trickle: presumably because there is NOTHING CONCRETE to discuss.

Have you let feature creep make you get lost in the woods?

[FourthWorld]

How much salary is he being paid?
How many code contributions have you made?

That's how much obligation he has to answer questions of accountability.

[richmond62]

He has answered on the OXT Facebook page.

[micmac]

Can you link it, please

Michael

[FourthWorld]

The most recent post I see there is from September.
https://m.facebook.com/groups/4225407080899934/

[micmac]

Thanks for the link.

Im not on Facebook and this demands a login.

Could it be referenced here.

(and why is it not here in the first place)

Thanks
Michael

[FourthWorld]

Paul's September post on FB had nothing to do with OXT. It was a link to a talk by Bill Atkinson at Carnegie Mellon:
https://scs.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/ ... 91Lg4CRfJo

I'm not able to turn up the FB post Richmond referred to.

[richmond62]

https://www.facebook.com/groups/openxtalk

I’m still shooting for a May release of some kind.

Which would be absolutely marvellous.

[tperry2x]

Which would be absolutely marvellous.

+1 Yes, it would be highly appreciated. Even if it's May the 31st!

[FourthWorld]

https://www.facebook.com/groups/openxtalk

I’m still shooting for a May release of some kind.

Which would be absolutely marvellous.

This is what I see at that URL:

Screenshots_2023-05-19-17-54-34.png (121.29 KiB) Viewed 6336 times