IDBFS
Note
This file system is only for use when running code inside a browser.
The IDBFS file system implements the FS.syncfs() interface, which when called will persist any operations to an IndexedDB instance.
This is provided to overcome the limitation that browsers do not offer synchronous APIs for persistent storage, and so (by default) all writes exist only temporarily in-memory.
OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
Forum rules
A place to discuss and plan OpenSource xTalk (not exclusively LCC based) and Community Builds of LCC
Ask NOT what xTalk can do for you... get involved you DO have something to contribute, no matter your skillset!
A place to discuss and plan OpenSource xTalk (not exclusively LCC based) and Community Builds of LCC
Ask NOT what xTalk can do for you... get involved you DO have something to contribute, no matter your skillset!
- OpenXTalkPaul
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
I also want to look into IDBFS FS.sync function, maybe that needs to be called in order to actually write the bytes of a files in memory to an Emscripten attached IDBFS virtual file system?
- OpenXTalkPaul
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
I put up a new version of the OpenXTalk web playground that has some of MetaCard IDE included in it.
https://openxtalk-org.github.io/OpenXTalk-Playground/
Of course IDE tools do us no good if we cannot save/export our edited stack files!
https://openxtalk-org.github.io/OpenXTalk-Playground/
Of course IDE tools do us no good if we cannot save/export our edited stack files!
- OpenXTalkPaul
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
Over the weekend I started to clean up this demo stack's UI, and I did some more tinkering around with Web Speech API via Emscripten Engine:
https://openxtalk-org.github.io/OpenXTalk-Playground/
Now you can pick a voice from list retrieved via Web Speech API.
This list may be different depending on the Browser engine and version.
Even if I can't get the thing to save changes to a stack file, I still want at least some IDE functionality, I've added some of he old MetaCard IDE (because that was mostly self-contained) just to play around with this idea. You can make and navigate to new cards in the main stack, create image controls and draw on them, use menu to copy text to the browsers clipboard, and of course the previous xT and JS demo scripts (now placed into menus), but not too much else so far.
FYI: As mentioned previously, there are ways to run the Emscripten Engine without any of the files being 'online',
All the major Browsers all have some sort of method for developers to do this, and you don't even need to run a local HTTP server to do it. And of course there are a few WebApp->DektopApp wrappers around (Electron/V8/Node etc.)
https://openxtalk-org.github.io/OpenXTalk-Playground/
Now you can pick a voice from list retrieved via Web Speech API.
This list may be different depending on the Browser engine and version.
Even if I can't get the thing to save changes to a stack file, I still want at least some IDE functionality, I've added some of he old MetaCard IDE (because that was mostly self-contained) just to play around with this idea. You can make and navigate to new cards in the main stack, create image controls and draw on them, use menu to copy text to the browsers clipboard, and of course the previous xT and JS demo scripts (now placed into menus), but not too much else so far.
FYI: As mentioned previously, there are ways to run the Emscripten Engine without any of the files being 'online',
All the major Browsers all have some sort of method for developers to do this, and you don't even need to run a local HTTP server to do it. And of course there are a few WebApp->DektopApp wrappers around (Electron/V8/Node etc.)
- OpenXTalkPaul
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
Import for Text data and image is working.
And Save to file for text in the fld works
And Save to file for text in the fld works
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2021 5:05 pm
- Contact:
Re: OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
Paul, please continue with your online IDE experiment and online dictionary. I'm following your progress.
- OpenXTalkPaul
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
Cool, glad to know that I'm not just talking to myself, haha!
- tperry2x
- Posts: 2475
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Somewhere in deepest darkest Norfolk, England
- Contact:
Re: OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
I love the progress on this, and I'm following along too.
I don't have anything constructive to add, so that's why I'm quiet on this topic - however I do find it interesting.
I don't have anything constructive to add, so that's why I'm quiet on this topic - however I do find it interesting.
- OpenXTalkPaul
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
https://openxtalk-org.github.io/OpenXTalk-Playground/
Now it plays the HyperCard sound BOING!
Not only that but it plays it pitch-shifted multiple times to form a chord, and does so using only plain web-audio API.
Now it plays the HyperCard sound BOING!
Not only that but it plays it pitch-shifted multiple times to form a chord, and does so using only plain web-audio API.
- OpenXTalkPaul
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
I wrote a lengthy post about having updated this earlier today, but I guess I got side-tracked by RL and never posted it?OpenXTalkPaul wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:57 pm https://openxtalk-org.github.io/OpenXTalk-Playground/
Now it plays the HyperCard sound BOING!
Not only that but it plays it pitch-shifted multiple times to form a chord, and does so using only plain web-audio API.
Sigh...
Updated this afternoon:
https://openxtalk-org.github.io/OpenXTalk-Playground/
So with the Emscripten engine having an xTalk<>Javascript bridge thereby enabling polyglot programming mixing the two, not only can we use it to access all of HTML5 APIs, like using web audio API to pitch-shift sound samples for use as musical notes, but now, at the low low cost of an additional 40Kb of downloading, the on-screen Piano actually outputs sound, in real-time (or close enough to it so as to be useful) using webaudio-tinySynth.js and thanks to a snippet from General Music library you can change programs (Musical Instrument Sounds) too. Webaudio-tinySynth.js is a fully functional MIDI playback synthesizer engine with 128 instrument sound bank. But don't expect it to sound like a $10K Moog, tinySynth sounds like late 1980s 16 bit Game console quality (think 16bit SEGA), and that's on it's good' setting, and on it's low-quality setting it sounds like early 1980s 'chip-tunes' 8bit game console music. But it works, it can play MIDI file data (so I can get playSentence/'PlayPMD' working on the web), and it's really tiny and self contained.
https://github.com/g200kg/webaudio-tinysynth
There's a slight lag (latency) and it could be a variety of things.
I wonder if it could be smoother without graphics compositing. You see I noticed after deploying that the Piiano's keys highlight color is actually set to be semi-transparent, you can see the background objects blending though it while the 'keys' are pressed, but needn't be. That's comes at cost of extra processing for rendering.
This code will play a MIDI file
Code: Select all
synth.loadMIDI('https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/55/MIDI_sample.mid');
synth.playMIDI('https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/55/MIDI_sample.mid');
- OpenXTalkPaul
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: OXT Cloud IDE v0.00000001
It's just occurred to me that JavaScript can make iFrames elements and set the contents of them 'on the fly', which I suppose is a bit like having a 'browser widget' inside of a web page.
If you paste this into OXT Playground web stack 'input' text area, and then click 'Do Console Text as Javascript' inside the stack, you'll get the idea of what I'm going on about:
That creates a new frame in the web page and loads a second instance of the web stack into that frame (but since it's of the same origin site, it doesn't need to re-download the 28mb Emscripten Engine)
Then it occurred to me that HyperSim's Engine could be embedded into our Emscripten powered 'web-stack' and then 'HCSim' based 'web-stacks' could be generated and previewed while both kinds of 'web-stacks' are live inside frames of a single browser window, which offers the chance at building a web-app-standalone-IDE for HCSim. That means no server back-end would be required in order to create HTML5/HCsim based 'web-stacks' and it would be usable on just about anything that has a modern web-browser, and the outputs 'stacks' are HTML/JS pages, which could then be wrapped in an offline web-app-to-desktop-app wrapper like Electron if you wanted an off-line desktop app. HCSim is smaller and loads faster than our Emscripten Engine.
Using this instead of the previous code creates a new frame and writes new web-page content into that frame:
I know HyperSim already is its own IDE of sorts, but I'd really like to see if I could push that well beyond being a HyperCard-simulation. Being built more on web standards (at least compared to the Emscripten engine being a JS port of a 30+ year old UNIX app) means that a LOT could be done with it. I think it would be fairly easy to add things like an HTML5 video 'player control' (there's already a video on one of the cards of Dan's HCSim intro 'Home' stack). And of course the web already has full support for things like SVG (animated!), and unicode support ready for the odd ancient-Sumerian web-fonts
As much as I still want the direct 'bare-metal' hardware and OS API access of a 'real' desktop app, there's also a hell of a lot on the 'plus' side to 'piggy-backing' an xTalk 'engine' on top of JS+HTML5. Now days with JavaScript on the desktop there's quite a large ecosystem of things like Node.js , React Native, JSX (JavaScript for Automation), offline-WebAssembly, etc. Web-app-wrappers can be less 'sand-boxed' than running inside a web-browser, for example 'Electron' apps can run shell scripts (Electron was developed by GitHub for 'hackable' code editor Atom, now called 'Pulsar').
If you paste this into OXT Playground web stack 'input' text area, and then click 'Do Console Text as Javascript' inside the stack, you'll get the idea of what I'm going on about:
Code: Select all
const iframe = document.createElement("iframe");
iframe.src = "https://openxtalk-org.github.io/OpenXTalk-Playground/";
iframe.width = 1000 ;
iframe.height = 1000 ;
iframe.id = 'subpage' ;
document.body.appendChild(iframe);
Then it occurred to me that HyperSim's Engine could be embedded into our Emscripten powered 'web-stack' and then 'HCSim' based 'web-stacks' could be generated and previewed while both kinds of 'web-stacks' are live inside frames of a single browser window, which offers the chance at building a web-app-standalone-IDE for HCSim. That means no server back-end would be required in order to create HTML5/HCsim based 'web-stacks' and it would be usable on just about anything that has a modern web-browser, and the outputs 'stacks' are HTML/JS pages, which could then be wrapped in an offline web-app-to-desktop-app wrapper like Electron if you wanted an off-line desktop app. HCSim is smaller and loads faster than our Emscripten Engine.
Using this instead of the previous code creates a new frame and writes new web-page content into that frame:
Code: Select all
const iframe = document.createElement("iframe");
iframe.width = 1000 ;
iframe.height = 1000 ;
iframe.id = 'subpage' ;
document.body.appendChild(iframe);
document.getElementById('subpage').contentWindow.document.write("<html><body>Hello world</body></html>");
As much as I still want the direct 'bare-metal' hardware and OS API access of a 'real' desktop app, there's also a hell of a lot on the 'plus' side to 'piggy-backing' an xTalk 'engine' on top of JS+HTML5. Now days with JavaScript on the desktop there's quite a large ecosystem of things like Node.js , React Native, JSX (JavaScript for Automation), offline-WebAssembly, etc. Web-app-wrappers can be less 'sand-boxed' than running inside a web-browser, for example 'Electron' apps can run shell scripts (Electron was developed by GitHub for 'hackable' code editor Atom, now called 'Pulsar').
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests