by OpenXTalkPaul » Tue Sep 28, 2021 5:40 pm
SethMorrow wrote: ↑Tue Sep 28, 2021 12:22 pm
I actually created a little stack to help me with editing the dictionary docs, so going back through to change "OpenXTalk" to something more generic like "the software" or "the engine" should be pretty easy. Whatever seems best. I can only really dedicate weekend time to this, but I am open to any and all suggestions. In my mind, the first thing we need, before adding anything new at all, is to have fully debranded and functional versions compiled. To that end, I will be attempting to compile and test a version with my edited docs on (64 bit) linux this weekend and then Windows when I have the time. I have no illusions that we will in anyway be able to keep up with or compete with LC, nor should we want to. I just want to see a living open source version remain available to educators and hobbysists. This certainly isn't going to happen overnight, but I think it's well within the realm of possibility to keep this thing alive.
I Agree. I plan to keep working at this for as long as it takes (forever), if that means I have to become a C++ pro, study programming language design, assembly language, etc. whatever it takes, I'm going to keep trying to do it. I'm in for the long haul.
There's basically a community of three people here so far, dedicating our limited spare time for the love of it, along with some curious visitors. Anyone coming here looking for a free alternative to a commercial product with commercial support is mistaken.
[quote=SethMorrow post_id=352 time=1632831734 user_id=52]
I actually created a little stack to help me with editing the dictionary docs, so going back through to change "OpenXTalk" to something more generic like "the software" or "the engine" should be pretty easy. Whatever seems best. I can only really dedicate weekend time to this, but I am open to any and all suggestions. In my mind, the first thing we need, before adding anything new at all, is to have fully debranded and functional versions compiled. To that end, I will be attempting to compile and test a version with my edited docs on (64 bit) linux this weekend and then Windows when I have the time. I have no illusions that we will in anyway be able to keep up with or compete with LC, nor should we want to. I just want to see a living open source version remain available to educators and hobbysists. This certainly isn't going to happen overnight, but I think it's well within the realm of possibility to keep this thing alive.
[/quote]
I Agree. I plan to keep working at this for as long as it takes (forever), if that means I have to become a C++ pro, study programming language design, assembly language, etc. whatever it takes, I'm going to keep trying to do it. I'm in for the long haul.
There's basically a community of three people here so far, dedicating our limited spare time for the love of it, along with some curious visitors. Anyone coming here looking for a free alternative to a commercial product with commercial support is mistaken.